Graham Williams
Probably the most important message that we must give to students doing first year mathematics is that, to have any chance of success in mathematics, a student must actually do mathematics. No amount of listening to lectures or reading textbooks can substitute for attempting problems. For this reason tutorials are an extremely important part of our subjects, particularly those in first year. This importance is borne out by student surveys which indicate that students learn more from tutorials than they do from lectures. Unfortunately tutorials are expensive to run and so we must make the most of our opportunities.
Individual tutors run their tutorials in a variety of ways but, in the past, the general pattern for tutorials in the Department of Mathematics has been the same. Some time was devoted to a discussion of assignments, both those being returned and those about to be done, followed by a general question time when the students could ask for clarification on any topic. Any spare time was spent on questions set by the tutor, with either a presentation by students of their results or perhaps individual work with individual assistance from the tutor.
During the Spring Session of 1992 we tried a different method of running tutorials in MATH 101. The method had been used at a number of universities including LaTrobe and New England. Both Sid Morris (the Dean) and Phil Broadbridge (Department Head) had run tutorials in this way before and suggested the method with some enthusiasm. The central idea is to use a room that has enough blackboards for every student to be able to use a board at the same time. Sid Morris found a suitable room in the ITC building - an internal room with only one door and no windows. He had it converted for our use by putting blackboards on all four walls. The room is now fondly referred to as 'The Blackboard Room' by tutors and students.
When students arrive they are given a sheet of questions to attempt and they start work immediately by writing their solutions on their piece of board. Their working is on view for the tutor to see and also, more importantly, for the other students to see. Anyone who is stuck on a problem can then look around to see what the others have done and with these clues can then proceed with their own solution. This has several advantages:
At the end of the tutorial solutions are handed out for all the problems. This is essential as, of course, there is no way they can take their own working away with them! It is necessary to ensure there are enough problems for the best students which means weaker students may only get through some of them in the tutorial. However, since all students get the solutions they can finish at home or at least refer to the solutions if they have to attempt a similar problem.
There are some small disadvantages but in our experience they are far outweighed by the positive aspects.
Before running the first tutorial, most of our staff were somewhat sceptical about the idea. However, without exception, all of the tutors in MATH 101 are most enthusiastic and when given the choice between taking a blackboard tutorial or a tutorial in an ordinary room the choice is always for the blackboard style.
Following the success of our first trial session we have had another room converted. Room 15.204 in the Austin Keane building also has blackboards on all four walls and with these two rooms we are now able to run about two thirds of all our tutorials in this manner.
Although this report has discussed its use in MATH 101 the room was also used extensively in STAT 131 and to a lesser extent in MATH 121 and MATH 151. I believe the methods have a lot to offer in all courses and certainly should not be restricted to first year. Nor indeed should they be restricted to Mathematics.
Anyone interested in observing one of these tutorials in progress should contact me so we can arrange a time. However, since the aim is to get everyone involved, you should expect to attempt the questions yourself!
4 August 1995